Cost-utility Analysis of Ambulatory Care Compared to Conventional Patient Care of Permanent Pacemakers Replacement for Elective Replacement Indicator
START study is a comparison of cost-utility between permanent pacemaker replacement ambulatory care and permanent pacemaker replacement conventional hospitalization care. The hypothesis of the study is that ambulatory care compared to conventional hospitalization, involving a stay of more than 24 hours, would reduce hospitalization and care expenses without loss of quality of care and without increasing the complication rate for patients.
• Man or woman over 18 years old.
• Replacement of permanent pacemakers for battery elective wear without programmed act in the sensors regardless of pacemaker type, simple, dual or triple chambers and regardless pacemaker label.
• Patient living less than an hour from a hospital center
• Patient is able to answer the phone.
• Patient has an accompaniment the go out night
• Pacemaker-dependent patient or not regardless of indication of placement of the pacemaker
• Patient with or without anticoagulant treatment: the anticoagulant treatment is managed by center under these habits.
• Patient has given this free and informed consent.
• Patient having insurance in France.