Patient-reported outcomes in hip resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a register-based matched cohort study of 726 patients.

Journal: Acta Orthopaedica
Treatment Used: Metal-On-Metal Hip Resurfacing (MoM-HR) vs Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)
Number of Patients: 363
Published:
MediFind Summary

Summary: This study compared the outcomes in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (bone is reshaped and capped with a metal prosthesis; MoM-HR) versus conventional total hip arthroplasty (total hip replacement; THA).

Conclusion: The type of prosthesis did not influence quality of life, pain, or other self-reported symptoms. At 7 years after surgery, patients with hip resurfacing (bone is reshaped and capped with a metal prosthesis) had better hip function than patients with conventional total hip arthroplasty (total hip replacement).

Abstract

Background and purpose - The theoretical mechanical advantages of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoM-HR) compared with conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been questioned. Studies including measures of patient-reported function, physical activity, or health-related quality of life have been sparse. We compared patient-reported outcomes in MoM-HR patients with a matched group of patients with conventional THA at 7 years post-surgery. Patients and methods - Patients and patient data were retrieved from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. The case group, consisting of 363 patients with MoM-HR, was matched 1:1 with a control group, consisting of patients with a conventional THA. Patients were sent a postal patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) questionnaire including the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), EQ-5D, and VAS pain. We used multivariable linear regression analyses to investigate the influence of prosthesis type. Results - 569 patients (78%) returned the questionnaire with complete responses (299 MoM-HRs and 270 conventional THAs). MoM-HR was associated with better scores in HOOS function of daily living (4 percentage units) and HOOS function in sport and recreation (8 percentage units) subscales. Type of prosthesis did not influence HOOS quality of life, HOOS pain, HOOS symptoms, EQ-5D index, hip pain, or satisfaction as measured with visual analog scales. Interpretation - At mean 7 years post-surgery, patients with hip resurfacing had somewhat better self-reported hip function than patients with conventional THA. The largest difference between groups was seen in the presumed most demanding subscale, i.e., function in sport and recreation.

Authors
Alexander Oxblom, Håkan Hedlund, Szilard Nemes, Harald Brismar, Li Felländer Tsai, Ola Rolfson

Similar Latest Advances