Comparative Analysis of Different Physiotherapy Interventions on Craniovertebral Angle in Individuals With Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Radiculopathy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status: Recruiting
Location: See location...
Intervention Type: Other
Study Type: Interventional
Study Phase: Not Applicable
SUMMARY

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) and radiculopathy are prevalent musculoskeletal conditions that afflict a substantial portion of the population, causing significant discomfort and impairments in daily functioning. MPS is characterized by localized muscle pain, trigger points, and referred pain, often accompanied by stiffness and restricted range of motion. A common feature shared by individuals with MPS and radiculopathy is the presence of postural abnormalities and balance impairments . The craniovertebral angle, which reflects the relationship between the head and neck, is often compromised in these individuals due to muscle imbalances, pain-related guarding, and structural changes in the spine. Various physiotherapy modalities, including dry needling, manual mobilization and soft tissue release, trigger point therapy, stretching, cupping therapy, and electrotherapy, have been utilized in clinical practice, but their relative efficacy in improving the craniovertebral angle and alleviating symptoms in individuals with MPS and radiculopathy has not been comprehensively compared. Understanding the underlying mechanisms and comparative effectiveness of various physiotherapy interventions is essential for guiding evidence-based clinical decision-making and optimizing treatment outcomes for individuals with MPS and radiculopathy. By elucidating the effects of different treatment modalities on the craniovertebral angle and associated outcomes, this research endeavor aims to contribute to the development of more tailored and effective physiotherapy approaches for improving the well-being of individuals affected by these debilitating musculoskeletal conditions.

Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Minimum Age: 20
Maximum Age: 40
Healthy Volunteers: f
View:

• Age: Participants must be between 20 and 40 years old.

• Gender: Both genders, Male and Female have equal chance of selection as participant in the study.

• Diagnosis: Participants must have a confirmed diagnosis of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS), altered cervical posture, restricted range of motion of cervical spine due to muscular spasm etc, altered craniovertebral angle, pain in cervical region or upper extremity and/or radiculopathy by a qualified healthcare professional, based on standardized diagnostic criteria (e.g., clinical examination, imaging studies).

• Severity: Participants should have mild to moderate symptoms of MPS and/or radiculopathy, as determined by the assessing healthcare provider.

• Willingness to Participate: Participants must be willing and able to comply physically and mentally with the study procedures, including attending scheduled physiotherapy sessions and completing outcome assessments.

• Informed Consent: Participants will have to provide written informed consent mendatorily to be selected as participant in the study after receiving detailed information about the study aims, procedures, potential risks, and benefits.

Locations
Other Locations
Pakistan
National Orthopedic and General Hospital
RECRUITING
Bahawalpur
Contact Information
Primary
Nasir Mehmood, MPhil
n.mehmood777@gmail.com
+923346165226
Backup
Mahtab AM Patafi, M.Phil
+923017766019
Time Frame
Start Date: 2025-03-15
Estimated Completion Date: 2025-09-15
Participants
Target number of participants: 100
Treatments
Experimental: Dry Needling
this group will receive dry needling with myofascial release
Experimental: Trigger Point Therapy
this will receive trigger point therapy with stretching
Experimental: Cupping Therapy
this will receive dry cupping therapy with Mobilizations Grade-1\&2
Active_comparator: Conventional Physiotherapy
Will receive electrotherapy with stretching and ROM exercises
Related Therapeutic Areas
Sponsors
Leads: National Orthopedic and General Hospital

This content was sourced from clinicaltrials.gov