Enteral Nutrition Delivery in Prone Position Ventilated Patients With Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status: Recruiting
Location: See location...
Intervention Type: Procedure
Study Type: Interventional
Study Phase: Not Applicable
SUMMARY

This pilot study is aimed to compare and assess the impact, safety, and practical utility of gastric versus postpyloric feeding in moderate to severe ARDS patients with prone position ventilation. Patients included will be randomly assigned to receive enteral nutrition either through a nasogastric tube or a nasojejunal tube. The primary endpoint is the achievement of enteral nutrition goals. Secondary endpoints include the incidence of hospital-acquired infections, the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days, ICU length of stay, ICU mortality, 28-day mortality, 60-day mortality rates, the incidence of enteral nutrition intolerance, and the rate of enteral nutrition intake.

Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Minimum Age: 18
Maximum Age: 85
Healthy Volunteers: f
View:

• ARDS patients who meet the Berlin criteria for ARDS and have a P/F ratio ≤ 200mmHg.

• Patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and clinically judged to require prone ventilation, with an anticipated daily prone positioning time of ≥12 hours and a duration of prone ventilation therapy of ≥3 days.

• Patients planned to receive enteral nutrition.

• Age ≥18 and ≤85 years.

• Consent to sign an informed consent form.

Locations
Other Locations
China
Zhongda hospital, Southeast university
RECRUITING
Nanjing
Contact Information
Primary
Airan Liu, PHD
airanliu@126.com
+8615295557466
Time Frame
Start Date: 2026-01-20
Estimated Completion Date: 2026-10-31
Participants
Target number of participants: 40
Treatments
Experimental: Post-pyloric feeding group
Enteral nutrition through nasojejunal tube
Active_comparator: Gastric feeding group
Enteral nutrition through nasogastric tube
Sponsors
Leads: Southeast University, China

This content was sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Similar Clinical Trials