A Prospective Phase II Study of Risk-stratification Based Bladder-sparing Modalities for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer After Chemotherapy Combined With PD-1 Antibody(Rebirth)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical cystectomy is the standard if care for cisplatin-eligible patients with MIBC. Developments in the last two decades suggest that bladder sparing therapy may be a valuable alternative to radical cystectomy. Currently, well-documented TMT regimens, which include complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, demonstrated durable oncologic control and long-term survival in selected patients. Nevertheless, TMT has not been widely used in clinical practice. On the one hand, due to the complexity of TMT, multiple clinical departments are required to cooperate in the assessment, treatment and follow-up of patients. On the other hand, concerns about tumor recurrence, lack of surgical intervention in regional lymph nodes, and organ dysfunction due to the treatment of large doses of pelvic radiation have reduced the clinical acceptance of TMT. In recent years, immunocheckpoint inhibitors such as PD-1/L1, including Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, and Tislelizumab, have proven to be promising immunotherapy approaches for advanced urothelium cancer, leading to breakthroughs in the treatment of advanced urothelium cancer. Immunocheckpoint inhibitors also showed positive efficacy in patients who did not respond to BCG treatment during perioperative period. Therefore, immunotherapy can be another means of bladder preservation after surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, bladder sparing target population is still unclear, among which, the NCCN guidelines recommend patients suitable for bladder preservation: T2-3N0M0, single lesion (longest diameter less than 6 cm), histological type of urothelial carcinoma, no CIS, and no hydronephrosis. Therefore, the focus of bladder preservation treatment is not only on the treatment before and during bladder preservation, but also on maximizing the follow-up treatment of TURBT and exploring its long-term benefits based on response to systematic treatment before maximized TURBT.
• Male or female aged 18 and ≤ 85;
• People who want to protect their bladder;
• ECOG PS 0 2 points;
• Subject underwent TURBT surgery and imaging diagnosis of musculothelial invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (histologic variation accepted, not diffuse CIS lesion);
• Accept maximum TURBT;
• Clinical stages T2-4A, N0-1, M0;
• Normal function of major organs (14 days prior to enrollment), i.e. meeting the following criteria:
‣ Blood routine examination criteria should be met (no blood transfusion and no granulocyte colony were received within 14 days before enrollment Stimulator therapy) :
‣ HB 90 g/L or higher The ANC acuity 1.5 x 109 / L PLT acuity 100 x 109 / L
⁃ No functional organic disease, the following criteria should be met:
∙ T-bil ≤1.5×ULN upper limit of normal value ALT and AST≤2.5×ULN If liver metastasis, ALT and AST≤5×ULN Estimated glomerular filtration rate (EGFR 60mL /min MdRD formula) International standardized ratio (INR), activated partial thrombin time aPTT ≤1.5× ULN(this standard is only applicable to patients who did not receive anticoagulant therapy; On anticoagulant therapy Patients should keep anticoagulants within the therapeutic range)
• Men who are fertile or women who are likely to become pregnant must use highly fertile men or women who are likely to become pregnant during the trial, Must be used in the testing process highly effective contraceptive methods (such as oral contraceptives, intrauterine contraceptive device, abstemious sexual desire or barrier contraception effective contraceptive methods (such as oral contraceptives, intrauterine contraceptive device, abstemious sexual desire or barrier contraceptive method combined with spermicide), and at the end of the treatment to birth control in combination with spermicide), and birth control for 12 months after the end of the treatment;
• Subjects voluntarily joined the study and signed informed consent with good compliance and follow-up. The subjects voluntarily joined the study and signed informed consent with good compliance and follow-up.