Gelsectan® in the Treatment of Patients With Diarrhoea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome: a Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is one of the major Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction (DGBI) and the most frequent reasons for referral to both primary care providers and gastroenterologists.IBS is not a life-threatening disease, but imposes a significant burden on society, entailing a decrease in patients' Quality of Life (QoL), elevated rates of psychological comorbidities and loss of work productivity, which might be the greatest in subjects with IBS-D, for whom the fear of incontinence in a social situation can be especially debilitating. Moreover, IBS is associated with significant direct and indirect healthcare costs and has a considerable socioeconomic impact on society. Treatment strategy for IBS is usually based on predominant symptoms and their severity, and requires a strong patient-physician relationship, as well as both non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches. Lifestyle interventions, such as dietary modifications, physical activity and lifestyle adjustments, and stress reduction/psychological therapy represent the most important initial non-pharmacological clinical approach for IBS patients, especially for those with mild disease. First-line pharmacological options for IBS-D include antidiarrheals, mainly loperamide, to control diarrhoea, as well as antispasmodic drugs to relieve IBS symptoms, in particular abdominal pain. Second-line therapies indicated for the treatment of global IBS-D symptoms include rifaximin, 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)3 receptor antagonists (alosetron, ondansetron and ramosetron) and eluxadoline. Other treatments recommended in patients with IBS-D consist of Tricyclic Anti-Depressants (TCAs) and bile acid sequestrants. Notably, management of patients with IBS is challenging since diagnosis and treatment could require several therapeutical strategies with often partial and unsatisfactory results. Indeed, most patients with IBS are dissatisfied with their current therapy and 34% report no symptom control, according to the IBS Global Impact Report of 2018. At present, there is a growing interest in therapeutic approaches for IBS-D aimed at improving intestinal barrier integrity for a more efficient control of symptoms, considering that an intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction and mucosal immune activation have been suggested as a central mechanism in IBS-D pathophysiology. In this perspective, film-forming agents capable of protecting the intestinal mucosal barrier, such as Xyloglucan (XG) and Pea protein may represent a valid alternative therapeutic option for the management of IBS-D. Gelsectan® is a CE-marked medical device under the European Union (EU) Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745, whose classification under the MDR is class III. Gelsectan® contains XG, Pea protein, grape seed extract, and Xylo-Oligosaccharides (XOS) and is indicated for symptomatic relief and prevention of chronic or relapsing diarrhoea, abdominal tension, pain, bloating and flatulence, as well as protection and restoration of intestinal mucosal function. Based on previous non-clinical studies and two clinical investigations, Gelsectan® seems to be safe and exert a protective action on the intestinal mucosa, mediating the restoration of intestinal permeability and the improvement of gastrointestinal symptoms associated with IBS-D. In particular, a 28-day treatment with Gelsectan® significantly reduced IBS-D-associated diarrhoea, abdominal pain and bloating, with no related adverse events in a randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over clinical study. Moreover, Gelsectan® treatment for 6 months was generally safe and effective in improving IBS severity, diarrhoea and bowel habit, as well as pain and bloating, in a recent multicentre, open-label, prospective, observational study. Of note, Gelsectan® was also mentioned in the recent clinical practice guidelines on IBS-D and functional diarrhoea of the United European Gastroenterology (UEG) and the European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM), and a recent consensus on IBS conducted by a panel of Belgian gastroenterologists. With these premises, the present study aims to further assess the performance and safety of Gelsectan® within the scope of its intended purpose, compared with placebo, on overall abdominal pain and symptoms in patients with IBS-D in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical study.
• Male or female, age ≥18 years and ≤ 65 years.
• Positive diagnosis of IBS, according to Rome IV diagnostic criteria, namely recurrent abdominal pain, on average, at least 1 day/week in the last 3 months associated with two or more of the following criteria:
‣ related to defecation
⁃ associated with a change in frequency stool
⁃ associated with a change in form (appearance) of stool The above criteria must be fulfilled for the last 3 months with symptom onset at least 6 months before diagnosis.
• Positive diagnosis of IBS-D subtype based on Rome IV diagnostic criteria, i.e., more than 25% of bowel movements with a consistency of type 6 or type 7 (loose or watery stools) on the BSFS, and less than 25% of bowel movements with BSFS types 1 or 2 (hard or lumpy stools), on days with at least one abnormal bowel movement.
• Negative results to any relevant additional tests or exams whenever deemed appropriate by the Investigator to exclude other disorders or causes of IBS symptoms.
• At least one type 6 or type 7 bowel movement based on the BSFS on at least 4 days within the last week prior to randomization.
• Weekly average score of 24-hours worst abdominal pain score ≥ 3 on NRS-11 in the last week prior to randomization.
• Electronic diary (e-diary) completed on at least 11 of 14 days (≥ 75%) during the screening period (i.e., 2 weeks prior to randomization).
• Willingness and capability to fulfil all tasks foreseen by the Clinical Investigation Plan (CIP).
• Signed written informed consent.
⁃ Females of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test (dipstick) at randomization and currently use or agree to use consistently and correctly (i.e., perfect use) a highly effective or acceptable effective contraceptive method for the individual subject and her partner(s) throughout the study treatment period and for at least one full contraceptive cycle (when applicable).