Comparison of the Application Effects of Different Drainage Modes in the Perioperative Period of Minimally Invasive Three-Field Radical Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
Status: Recruiting
Location: See location...
Intervention Type: Procedure
Study Type: Interventional
Study Phase: Not Applicable
SUMMARY
This RCT compares three drainage approaches after minimally invasive esophagectomy (chest tube + thoracic mediastinal drainage tube, thoracic, and abdominal mediastinal drainage tube) to evaluate perioperative outcomes, addressing current evidence gaps in pain and complication profiles.
Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Minimum Age: 18
Healthy Volunteers: f
View:
• Age ≥18 years
• Pathologically confirmed esophageal cancer requiring three-incision esophagectomy (cervical, thoracic, and abdominal incisions)
• ASA physical status class I-III
Locations
Other Locations
China
Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
RECRUITING
Shanghai
Contact Information
Primary
Hecheng Li, PhD, MD
lihecheng2000@hotmail.com
00862164370045
Backup
Wangyang Meng, MD
mengwymed@163.com
00861592767592
Time Frame
Start Date: 2025-04-30
Estimated Completion Date: 2026-08-01
Participants
Target number of participants: 75
Treatments
Experimental: Abdominal mediastinal tube
Transperitoneal mediastinal drainage was performed for postoperative management of the patient.
Experimental: Chest mediastinal tube
Transthoracic mediastinal drainage was performed for postoperative management of the patient.
Experimental: Chest tube + chest mediastinal tube
Chest tube insertion combined with transthoracic mediastinal drainage was performed for postoperative management of the patient.
Related Therapeutic Areas
Sponsors
Leads: Ruijin Hospital