Comparison of Catheter Ablation Combined With Ethanol Ablation of the Marshall Vein vs. Catheter Ablation Alone in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation With Heart Failure: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
This multicenter, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of combining catheter ablation with Marshall vein ethanol ablation versus catheter ablation alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant heart failure. Persistent AF is a common arrhythmia that significantly impacts the quality of life and survival rates, especially when coexisting with heart failure. While catheter ablation is a standard treatment for AF, its effectiveness in persistent AF, particularly in patients with heart failure, remains suboptimal. The addition of Marshall vein ethanol ablation may enhance treatment outcomes by targeting arrhythmogenic substrates. This study will enroll 120 participants across three centers to evaluate whether this combined approach can reduce AF recurrence, improve heart function, and enhance patient outcomes compared to catheter ablation alone.
• Age between 18 and 80 years
• For symptomatic patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: At least a 6-month history of atrial fibrillation; atrial fibrillation duration exceeding 7 days without spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm; at least two episodes of persistent atrial fibrillation in the past 6 months even after rhythm conversion; poor tolerance or resistance to at least one Class I, II, or III antiarrhythmic drug
• Diagnosed with heart failure: Echocardiogram showing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%
• Patient willing to receive medication or surgical treatment
• Patient willing to comply with the requirements before the study, during the study, and during follow-up and to sign an informed consent form
• Capable of completing a 6-minute walk test
• For women of childbearing potential, a negative pregnancy test result is required