Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis for Cancer Patients Who Suffer From Chronic Peripheral Lymphedema: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) with sham surgery for patients suffering from unilateral cancer-related lymphedema in either the upper or lower extremity. It aims to answer whether LVA is more effective than sham surgery in terms of improvement in Lymph-ICF score. A total of 110 participants will be allocated randomly into two groups at a 1:1 ratio. The first group will receive lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA), while the second group will undergo sham surgery.
• Treated for cancer and underwent treatment of either axillary or inguinal lymph nodes or radiotherapy;
• Early stage lymphedema (ISL I-II) in the upper or lower extremity, and diagnosed by lymphoscintigraphy for the lower extremity;
• Unilateral lymphedema;
• Viable lymphatic vessels as determined by indocyanine green (ICG)Lymphography (stage II-III);
• Refractory lymphedema that underwent at least three months of conservative treatment;
• Informed consent.