Selective Attention Deficits and Neuromodulation in Major Depressive Disorder: Using EEG and MRI-guided iTBS Study

Status: Recruiting
Location: See location...
Intervention Type: Device
Study Type: Interventional
Study Phase: Not Applicable
SUMMARY

Multimodal study (Behavior, TMS, EEG) combining a sham-controlled intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) intervention with an additional-singleton task and EEG to evaluate whether left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation enhances cognitive control and modulates maladaptive attention processes in MDD and whether the effects are influenced by neuronavigated versus manual (Beam F3 method) localization of the stimulation site.

Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Minimum Age: 18
Maximum Age: 55
Healthy Volunteers: f
View:

• 18-55 years

• Right-handed

• Normal or corrected normal visual acuity

• MDD: meet the proposed DSM-5 MDD criteria, unmedicated or stable medicated within the last one month. Healthy subjects without any past or present psychiatric or neurological disorders.

Locations
Other Locations
China
The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, Chengdu Fourth People's Hospital, Jiujiang Branch (Chengdu Mental Health Center)
RECRUITING
Chengdu
Time Frame
Start Date: 2024-01-01
Estimated Completion Date: 2028-12-30
Participants
Target number of participants: 60
Treatments
Experimental: MDD subjects in the active group undergo 10 days of MRI-guided iTBS intervention
Neuronavigation procedure: During the iTBS treatment, the high-resolution T1-weighted scans of each subject will be uploaded to the BrainSight neuronavigation system (version 2.4.11), adjusted, and remodelled into a three-dimensional model. Then, the neuronavigation system is calibrated and validated on the subject. Next, we localized each participant's left-lateral dlPFC stimulation target using Talairach coordinates (-45, 45, 35). The head position is standardized using the nasal tip, sinuses, and bilateral ear screens as baseline markers, and the location of the target on the scalp is identified in each participant's natural space anatomical image. In the end, we observe on the computer screen whether the coil position is placed above the target through the navigation software and artificially control the coil to be tangent to the skull, with the center of the figure-of-eight coil always directly above the target.
Sham_comparator: MDD controls in the sham-iTBS group receive the same intervention but Beam F3 site.
Target Localization and Cap Placement Procedure: The stimulation target was the EEG 10-20 coordinate F3, corresponding to the probabilistic location of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We localized this site using the Beam F3 method and a TMS elastic cap (patent no. 201120150878.5, Wuhan YIRUIDE Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.), and verified it with the F3 electrode on the standard EEG cap. Before the first session, the elastic cap was aligned using anatomical landmarks (nasion, inion, and ears), and the F3 position was marked for consistent coil placement. This standardized approach ensured precise and repeatable targeting across TMS sessions.
Related Therapeutic Areas
Sponsors
Leads: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

This content was sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Similar Clinical Trials