Vitrectomy Machine Versus Spring Loaded Syringe for Active Silicon Oil Extraxtion
Status: Recruiting
Location: See location...
Intervention Type: Device
Study Type: Interventional
Study Phase: Not Applicable
SUMMARY
The aim of our study is to compare between two techniques used for active SOR. The outcomes include efficiency and safety. Patients with silicon filled eyes and prepared for SOR 540 eyes of 505 patients (one eye in 470 patients, and both eyes in 35 patients) were enrolled in the study. All eyes underwent SOR using 23-Gauge PPV. The eyes were classified according to the surgical technique used for SOR into two groups:- Group A: SOR was performed using SO extraction program built in Optikon vitrectomy device Group B: SOR was performed using modified spring loaded syringe.
Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Minimum Age: 18
Healthy Volunteers: f
View:
• Patients subjected previously to pars plana vitrectomy with silicon oil tamponade.
Locations
Other Locations
Egypt
Sohag Faculty of Medicine
RECRUITING
Sohag
Contact Information
Primary
Alaa A A Sinjab, Doctor degree in Ophthalmology
alaa.abdelsadek@med.sohag.edu.eg
+20-01064037382
Time Frame
Start Date: 2022-01-04
Estimated Completion Date: 2027-05
Participants
Target number of participants: 200
Treatments
Active_comparator: Group A
Conventional technique using vitrectomy machine
Active_comparator: Group B
Spring loaded syringe for silicon oil extraction
Related Therapeutic Areas
Sponsors
Leads: Sohag University