Bas J. Blaauboer

Utrecht, UT, Netherlands

Last Updated: 09/26/2026

Save publications for later

Sign Up

Not sure about your diagnosis?

Check Your Symptoms

Found 73 publications

The EU chemicals strategy for sustainability: in support of the BfR position.

The EU chemicals strategy for sustainability: in support of the BfR position.

Journal: Archives of toxicology

Published: July 12, 2021

Improving the quality of toxicology and environmental health systematic reviews: What journal editors can do.

Improving the quality of toxicology and environmental health systematic reviews: What journal editors can do.

Journal: ALTEX

Published: June 11, 2021

Corrigendum to "Critique of the "Comment" etitled "Pyrethroid exposure: not so harmless after all" by Demeneix et al. (2020) published in the lancet diabetes endocrinology".

Corrigendum to "Critique of the "Comment" etitled "Pyrethroid exposure: not so harmless after all" by Demeneix et al. (2020) published in the lancet diabetes endocrinology".

Journal: Toxicology letters

Published: April 27, 2021

Critique of the "Comment" etitled "Pyrethroid exposure: Not so harmless after all" by Demeneix et al. (2020) published in the lancet diabetes endocrinology.

Critique of the "Comment" etitled "Pyrethroid exposure: Not so harmless after all" by Demeneix et al. (2020) published in the lancet diabetes endocrinology.

Journal: Toxicology letters

Published: December 16, 2020

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Journal: Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A

Published: June 20, 2020

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity: how to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity: how to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Journal: Archives of toxicology

Published: May 27, 2020

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Journal: Chemico-biological interactions

Published: May 07, 2020

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Journal: Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA

Published: May 04, 2020

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Journal: Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association

Published: April 08, 2020

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Journal: Environmental toxicology and pharmacology

Published: April 07, 2020

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Journal: Toxicology letters

Published: April 06, 2020

New approach methodologies (NAMs) for human-relevant biokinetics predictions. Meeting the paradigm shift in toxicology towards an animal-free chemical risk assessment

New approach methodologies (NAMs) for human-relevant biokinetics predictions. Meeting the paradigm shift in toxicology towards an animal-free chemical risk assessment

Journal: ALTEX

Published: March 25, 2020

Showing 1-12 of 73

Last Updated: 09/26/2026