Rosa A. Enklaar
Nijmegen, GE, Netherlands
Last Updated: 09/26/2026
Save publications for later
Sign Up
Not sure about your diagnosis?
Check Your Symptoms
Found 10 publications
Sexual function after the manchester procedure versus sacrospinous hysteropexy in women treated for uterine prolapse: a planned analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
Journal: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Published: June 02, 2025
Economic evaluation of Manchester procedure versus sacrospinous hysteropexy: A follow-up analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
Journal: PloS one
Published: October 10, 2024
Manchester Procedure vs Sacrospinous Hysteropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Reply.
Journal: JAMA
Published: December 26, 2023
Patient's preference for sacrospinous hysteropexy or modified Manchester operation: A discrete choice experiment.
Journal: BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Published: February 09, 2022
The modified Manchester Fothergill procedure compared with vaginal hysterectomy with low uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: long-term outcome.
Journal: International urogynecology journal
Published: December 29, 2021
Practice pattern variation: treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in The Netherlands.
Journal: International urogynecology journal
Published: May 12, 2021
Gynecologists' perspectives on two types of uterus-preserving surgical repair of uterine descent; sacrospinous hysteropexy versus modified Manchester.
Journal: International urogynecology journal
Published: August 10, 2020
How cure rates drive patients' preference for urethral bulking agent or mid-urethral sling surgery as therapy for stress urinary incontinence.
Journal: Neurourology and urodynamics
Published: November 26, 2018
Showing 1-10 of 10
Last Updated: 09/26/2026