The efficacy of IMAAVY for the treatment of gMG in adults who are anti-AChR or anti-MuSK antibody positive was established in a 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (Study 1; NCT04951622). Patients were treated with IMAAVY with the recommended dosage regimen
Study 1 enrolled patients with gMG who met the following criteria:
- Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Clinical Classification Class II to IV
- Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) total score of at least 6
- On stable dose of standard of care MG therapy prior to baseline that included acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors, steroids or non-steroidal immunosuppressive therapies (NSISTs), either in combination or alone.
In Study 1, a total of 196 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive IMAAVY (n=98) or placebo (n=98). Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. For the primary efficacy analysis population (n=153), patients had a median age of 52 years at screening (range 20 to 81 years) and a median time since diagnosis of 6 years. Sixty percent of patients were female; 63% were White; 32% were Asian; 1% were Black or African-American; and <1% were American Indian or Alaskan Native. At baseline, median MG-ADL total score was 9, and median Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total score was 15. Eighty-eight percent (n=134) of patients were positive for AChR antibodies and 10% (n=16) were positive for MuSK antibodies.
At baseline, in each group, 85% of patients received AChE inhibitors, 66% of patients received steroids, and 54% of patients received NSISTs at stable doses.
The efficacy of IMAAVY was measured using the MG-ADL scale, which assesses the impact of gMG on daily functions of 8 signs and symptoms that are typically affected in gMG. Each item is assessed on a 4-point scale, where a score of 0 represents normal function and a score of 3 represents loss of ability to perform that function. A total score ranges from 0 to 24, with the higher scores indicating more impairment.
The primary efficacy endpoint was the comparison of the mean change from baseline to Weeks 22, 23, and 24 between treatment groups in the MG-ADL total score. A statistically significant difference favoring IMAAVY was observed in MG-ADL total score change from baseline (p=0.002; see
The efficacy of IMAAVY was also measured using the QMG total score, which is a 13-item categorial grading system that assesses muscle weakness. Each item is assessed on a 4 -point scale, where a score of 0 represents no weakness, and a score of 3 represents severe weakness. A total possible score ranges from 0 to 39, where higher scores indicate more severe impairment.
The secondary endpoint was the comparison of the mean change from baseline to Weeks 22 and 24 between treatment groups in the QMG total score. A statistically significant difference favoring IMAAVY was observed in the QMG total score change from baseline (p<0.001; see
The results are presented shown in Table 2.
Figure 1 shows the mean change from baseline to Week 24 in MG-ADL total score in Study 1, and Figure 2 shows the mean change from baseline to Week 24 in QMG total score in Study 1.
Figure 1: Least Squares Mean Change from Baseline in MG-ADL Total Score Over 24 Weeks in Study 1
LS = least squares, SE = standard error, MG-ADL = Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living
Figure 2: Least Squares Mean Change from Baseline in QMG Total Score Over 24 Weeks in Study 1
LS = least squares, SE = standard error, QMG = Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis.