Comparison Between Nasal and Oropharyngeal Bleeding in Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation in Maxillofacial Trauma Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status: Recruiting
Location: See location...
Intervention Type: Procedure
Study Type: Interventional
Study Phase: Not Applicable
SUMMARY

The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for nasal intubation in patients with maxillofacial fractures regarding less bleeding to oral and nasal structures, quicker intubation times, increased success rates for first intubation attempts, fewer uses of the Magill forceps and the less need for cervical spine extension

Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Minimum Age: 18
Maximum Age: 70
Healthy Volunteers: f
View:

• Patients who will undergo maxillofacial surgeries with nasotracheal intubation..

• ASA I/II patients.

• BMI \<35

Locations
Other Locations
Egypt
Aswan University
RECRUITING
Aswān
Contact Information
Primary
Soudy S Hammad, MD
soudi.salah@aswu.edu.eg
+201014761523
Backup
Mohammed E Yahia, MSc
01125257916
Time Frame
Start Date: 2024-06-01
Estimated Completion Date: 2025-03-01
Participants
Target number of participants: 64
Treatments
Active_comparator: Group Ι Combined Video Laryngoscopy (VL) and Bougie
Group Ι Combined Video Laryngoscopy (VL) and Bougie: Nasal intubation will be performed using a video laryngoscope and a bougie.
Active_comparator: Group ΙI Direct Laryngoscopy (DL) and Bougie :
Nasal intubation will be performed using a traditional direct laryngoscope and a bougie.
Related Therapeutic Areas
Sponsors
Leads: Aswan University

This content was sourced from clinicaltrials.gov