A Comparative Study on the Diagnostic Efficacy of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Versus Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) for Ex Vivo Lung Biopsy Specimens Obtained Via Bronchoscopy
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (CLE) compared to Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) for ex vivo lung biopsy specimens obtained via bronchoscopy. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does CLE provide diagnostic accuracy comparable to ROSE for the real-time assessment of peripheral pulmonary lesions? 2. What is the level of consistency between CLE-detected malignant architectural patterns and ROSE-identified atypical cells? Participants with peripheral pulmonary lesions (5-50 mm) undergoing navigational bronchoscopy will have their first retrieved biopsy specimen sequentially analyzed. The specimen will undergo CLE scanning first, followed immediately by ROSE cytology, before being fixed for final histopathological examination (the gold standard). CLE and ROSE interpreters will be blinded to the final pathological results and to each other's findings. Diagnostic performance, inter-modality agreement (using Kappa statistics), and procedure times will be analyzed to determine if CLE can serve as a non-consumptive alternative to ROSE.
• （1）Imaging Findings: Presence of a peripheral pulmonary lesion (PPL) measuring 5 to 50 mm in maximum diameter on chest CT scan.
• （2）Clinical Indication: Patients with a clinical indication for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy and transbronchial biopsy.
• （3）Consent: Provision of signed and dated written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures.