Clinical Outcomes of Full Robotic Instrumentation Versus Assistant Controlled Laparoscopic Instrumentatin in Robotic Distal Gastrectomy: Randomized Pilot Study

Status: Recruiting
Location: See location...
Intervention Type: Procedure
Study Type: Interventional
Study Phase: Not Applicable
SUMMARY

This pilot study aims to provide valuable insights into the optimal surgical approach for robotic distal gastrectomy. By comparing full robotic procedures with assistant-controlled techniques, the results may guide future practice, enhancing surgical efficiency, reducing costs, and improving patient outcomes.

Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Minimum Age: 20
Healthy Volunteers: f
View:

• Patients with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma prior to surgery.

• Patients who have undergone a complete (R0) resection.

• Patients with an ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score of 3 or below.

• Patients undergoing robotic radical distal gastrectomy.

Locations
Other Locations
Republic of Korea
GangnamSeveranceHospital
RECRUITING
Seoul
Contact Information
Primary
In Gyu Kwon
gsirb@yuhs.ac
82-2-2019-4601
Time Frame
Start Date: 2025-02-01
Estimated Completion Date: 2026-03-31
Participants
Target number of participants: 36
Treatments
Experimental: Assistant-Controlled Group
The assistant performs vascular clipping using articulating Hemolock clip appliers or Challenger® clip appliers and performs the gastrointestinal anastomosis with an Echelon stapling system.
Active_comparator: Full Robotic Group
The surgeon performs vascular clipping using the robotic arm with Hemolock or Hemoclip appliers and performs anastomosis using a SureForm stapler.
Related Therapeutic Areas
Sponsors
Leads: Gangnam Severance Hospital

This content was sourced from clinicaltrials.gov