Hip Replacement Clinical Trials

Clinical trials related to Hip Replacement Procedure

Comparison Between Iliopsoas Block (IPB) and Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block on Postoperative Analgesia and Functional Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgery: a Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

Status: Recruiting
Location: See location...
Intervention Type: Procedure
Study Type: Interventional
Study Phase: Not Applicable
SUMMARY

Background: In recent years, regional anesthesia has become more popular because it can reduce pain and the need for strong pain medications like morphine. For hip surgery, the PENG block is already known to be effective. A newer method, called the iliopsoas plane block (IPB), is very similar and has also shown good results in hip arthroscopy. However, these two techniques have never been directly compared in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery using the posterior approach. Goal: This study aims to see if the IPB is just as effective as the PENG block for controlling pain and helping patients recover well after hip replacement surgery. Method: 118 adult patients scheduled for hip replacement under spinal anesthesia will be randomly assigned to receive either: IPB: 7 ml of Ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml PENG: 14 ml of Ropivacaine 3.75 mg/ml Both injections are given under ultrasound guidance 30 minutes before spinal anesthesia. Neither the patient, the surgeon, nor the data collector will know which technique was used. Post-Surgery Care: All patients will receive standard pain relief, including: Paracetamol every 6 hours Etoricoxib once a day Morphine via a patient-controlled pump for 48 hours Main Outcome Measured: The primary goal is to compare pain during movement 6 hours after surgery, using a pain scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). The study will consider the two blocks equivalent if the difference in average pain scores is less than 1 point. Other Outcomes: Total morphine used in 48 hours Pain scores at rest and during movement at various time points Walking ability (2- and 6-minute walk tests, and timed-up-and-go test) Quality of recovery (using the QoR-15 questionnaire) Side effects of morphine Patient satisfaction Length of hospital stay Safety: Both techniques are safe and already used in clinical practice. Ultrasound guidance minimizes risks like nerve injury, bleeding, or infection.

Conclusion: If the IPB is shown to be as effective as the PENG block, both can be considered reliable options for pain control and early recovery after hip replacement surgery.

Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Minimum Age: 18
Healthy Volunteers: f
View:

• Adult patients (age \>18 years) ASA physical status classification I-III Scheduled for elective posterior approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) under spinal anesthesia

Locations
Other Locations
Belgium
Liege University Hospital
RECRUITING
Liège
Contact Information
Primary
Michele Carella, MD, PhD, ESRA-DRA
mcarella@chuliege.be
+3242843658
Time Frame
Start Date: 2025-10-01
Estimated Completion Date: 2026-10-10
Participants
Target number of participants: 118
Treatments
Active_comparator: Group PENG
Patients will receive a pericapsular nerve group block with 14 ml of ropivacaine 3.75 mg/ml, administered 30 minutes prior to spinal anesthesia.
Active_comparator: IPB Group
Patients will receive an iliopsoas plane block with 7 ml of ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml, administered 30 minutes prior to spinal anesthesia.
Related Therapeutic Areas
Sponsors
Collaborators: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege
Leads: University of Liege

This content was sourced from clinicaltrials.gov