Prospective Evaluation of Long-term Clinical Outcomes After Resting Full-cycle Ratio (RFR)-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization; A Multi-center, International, Single Arm Interventional, Comparing Registry (COMFORT Study)

Status: Recruiting
Location: See location...
Intervention Type: Diagnostic test
Study Type: Observational
SUMMARY

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of a 2-year follow-up to determine whether RFR-guided coronary intervention is non-inferior to FFR-guided coronary intervention in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis.

Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Minimum Age: 20
Maximum Age: 90
Healthy Volunteers: f
View:

• Patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis (visually 50-90% diameter stenosis) who decided to undergoing a RFR-guided coronary intervention according to clinical necessity

• Patients who voluntarily decided to participate in this study and signed informed consent

Locations
Other Locations
Republic of Korea
Sejong general hospital, 91-121 Sosa 2-Dong, Sosa-Gu
RECRUITING
Bucheon-si
Contact Information
Primary
Hyun-Jong Lee, MD, PhD
untouchables00@hanmail.net
82-10-6217-9315
Backup
Su Jung Lee, RN
bjwwoki0827@daum.net
82-32-340-1812
Time Frame
Start Date: 2022-07-27
Estimated Completion Date: 2026-12-31
Participants
Target number of participants: 1167
Sponsors
Collaborators: Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Dong-A University Hospital, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Hospital San Carlos, Madrid, Soon Chun Hyang University, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Pusan National University Hospital, Ulsan University Hospital, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Leads: Sejong General Hospital

This content was sourced from clinicaltrials.gov