The Influence of Standardized Process Management of Laryngeal Mask Airway Placement Based on Pressure Monitoring on the Incidence of Adverse Reactions in Elderly Patients During the Perioperative Period

Status: Recruiting
Location: See location...
Intervention Type: Device
Study Type: Interventional
Study Phase: Not Applicable
SUMMARY

The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is a supraglottic ventilation device designed according to human anatomy. It was developed in 1981 by Dr. Archie Boubrain in the United Kingdom to compensate for the deficiencies of tracheal intubation and mask ventilation. It has been widely used in clinical practice because of its simple operation, small airway stimulation, and hemodynamic stability. In 1990, LMA entered the Chinese market. In 1993, LMA was included in the American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines for the emergency management of the difficult airway. In the past, tracheal intubation was the standard method of airway control during general anesthesia. In the past decade, the proportion of LMA ventilated general anesthesia has increased significantly in China and European and American countries. By 2022, the utilization rate of LMA in China climbed to 95.96%. With the continuous improvement and development of LMA, it can be used to establish safe airway management in special positions such as lateral position and prone position, long-term surgery and special site surgery. However, the wide application has also exposed some key problems. The lack of standardized process management of LMA placement may lead to improper placement, airway obstruction, laryngspasm, reflux, and aspiration during the application of LMA, which may cause a series of pulmonary and extrapulmonary complications. Studies have shown that many adverse events during LMA implantation may be related to LMA pressure monitoring. Inadequate pressure monitoring may lead to pressure imbalance, and improper pressure management may lead to poor coordination between LMA and pharynx. Coupled with the change in intraoperative position and postoperative transfer, the risk of postoperative sore throat and LMA displacement increases. Therefore, there is an urgent need for standardized process management, dynamic pressure monitoring and position adjustment during the use of LMA. The standardized management of LMA insertion involves the standardized selection, placement, maintenance management and transportation of LMA. Especially for the elderly population, LMA displacement is more likely to occur due to the atrophy of pharyngeal mucosa and muscle, weakened cough reflex, and decreased chest wall compliance, which increases the incidence of pulmonary and extrapulmonary complications. For elderly patients with atherosclerosis, LMA displacement and relatively high cuff pressure may compress the jugular and jugular veins in the neck and surrounding tissues, increasing the risk of stroke in elderly patients. Effective and safe anesthesia airway and respiratory management strategies during general anesthesia will directly affect the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and the incidence of sore throat in elderly patients. Standardized management of LMA and continuous pressure monitoring and adjustment can improve the above adverse reactions. At present, there is a lack of large-scale and reliable evidence-based medical evidence to evaluate the effect of standardized process management of laryngeal mask insertion based on pressure monitoring on perioperative adverse reactions in elderly patients with high risk of pulmonary complications. Especially in the elderly population with a high incidence of PPCs, the safety, short - and long-term advantages and disadvantages of widespread use of LMA ventilation are still unclear. Therefore, it is particularly urgent to carry out the effect of standardized process management of laryngeal mask insertion based on pressure monitoring on perioperative adverse reactions in elderly patients, and to further explore the appropriate range of laryngeal mask related pressure indicators. This study based on the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) can not only fill the current research gap, but also provide strong support for safe and efficient airway management in elderly patients during the perioperative period, and effectively promote the further optimization of clinical practice, which has extremely important clinical significance and practical value.

Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Minimum Age: 60
Healthy Volunteers: f
View:

• Age ≥60 years old

• Non-cardiothoracic surgery and head and neck surgery

• Elective surgery

• ASA I-III grade

• NYHA cardiac function class I-II

• The operation time is expected to be ≥30 minutes and ≤2 hours

• 18.5≤BMI (kg/m2) ≤24.9

Locations
Other Locations
China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
RECRUITING
Chongqing
Contact Information
Primary
Xuanqi Yang
734357421@qq.com
+8613408631952
Time Frame
Start Date: 2025-05-09
Estimated Completion Date: 2027-03-31
Participants
Target number of participants: 78
Treatments
Experimental: Experimental group: the pressure was monitored and adjusted in real time
The measured and adjusted airway pressure, cuff pressure and leak pressure were recorded
No_intervention: Control group:the pressure was measured once after empirical inflation of the laryngeal mask
The cuff pressure, airway pressure, and leak pressure were measured only once after empirical inflation under the condition of guaranteed ventilation
Related Therapeutic Areas
Sponsors
Collaborators: First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Leads: Xuanqi Yang

This content was sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Similar Clinical Trials