Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) of the lower extremities is common and prevalence of PAD is increasing in our aging population. The presence of PAD is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, reduced physical function and quality of life. Intermittent claudication is the most common symptom of PAD affecting about 30% of the patients. Supervised exercise therapy (SET) is safe and cost-effective therapy when compared with invasive revascularization, and is recommended as the first-line treatment for symptomatic PAD. However, SET is not readily available in the public healthcare system. Barriers to SET implementation include demands for healthcare resources and the inconvenience of travelling to designated centre for SET. Home-based exercise therapy (HBET) has been proposed as an alternative to SET as they are more accessible and more acceptable to patients, but the benefits of HBET compared to SET have not been consistently demonstrated in studies. Wearable activities monitor (WAM) have been proposed as an adjuvant to enhance the performance of HBET. However, there is no direct comparison of WAM enhanced HBET to SET. Furthermore, WAMs were mainly used for monitoring in HBET in the previous studies and patient feedback was conducted either in-person or over telephones by the researchers, which challenges the true meaning of HBET. In this study, we aim to evaluate the non-inferiority of personalized self-guided HBET enhanced with WAM and auto feedback mobile apps, to SET, in a randomized-controlled trial of patients with symptomatic PAD.