Road Mapping Guided Puncture Versus Ultrasound Guided Puncture During Retrograde Angioplasty Feasibility and Safety
Status: Recruiting
Location: See location...
Intervention Type: Procedure
Study Type: Interventional
Study Phase: Not Applicable
SUMMARY
The study aims to compare the technical feasibility and safety of road mapping-guided versus ultrasound-guided retrograde arterial puncture in patients with (CLTI) as measured by: * Puncture success rate * Access-related complication rate (e.g., hematoma, vessel dissection, perforation)
Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Minimum Age: 18
Healthy Volunteers: f
View:
• Adults : Both male and female participants.
• Diagnosed with critical limp threatening ischemia (CLTI):
• significant occlusions in the femoropopliteal
• o Rutherford Class 5: Non-healing wounds or ulcers
• Failed or unable to achieve antegrade access:
• Patients requiring retrograde puncture for the procedure.
• Planned intervention with retrograde access: Candidates for endovascular interventions, including angioplasty, stent deployment
Locations
Other Locations
Egypt
Sohag University Hospital
RECRUITING
Sohag
Contact Information
Primary
Yohana F Fayez, MBBCh
yohana_farouz_post@med.sohag.edu.eg
+201288374728
Time Frame
Start Date: 2026-02-01
Estimated Completion Date: 2027-03-01
Participants
Target number of participants: 32
Treatments
Experimental: Road Mapping Guided Puncture
Active_comparator: Ultrasound Guided Puncture
Related Therapeutic Areas
Sponsors
Leads: Sohag University