Randomized Double Blind Double Dummy Control Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab Versus Oral Cyclophosphamide in Severe Forms of Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid
Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) describes a group of chronic auto-immune bullous diseases (AIBD) of the basement membrane zone (BMZ), characterized by predominant or exclusive mucosal involvement, including oral, naso-pharyngeal, laryngo-tracheal, genital, oesophageal, anal and ocular mucous membranes. Circulating autoantibodies are directed against various antigens of the BMZ: BP180, laminin 332 and type 7 collagen. MMP is a rare disease with an incidence of 1.8 new cases/million inhabitants/year in France. Scar formation which is secondary to initial inflammation, is a characteristic feature of MMP, leading to major disability (e.g blindness and oesophageal, anal, vaginal stenosis) and life-threatening situations (e.g. laryngeal stenosis leading to respiratory failure). Dapsone is the first line treatment of mild/moderate forms of MMP. Dapsone is used both as initial treatment, and as maintenance therapy. However, severe forms of MMP can rapidly worsen leading to blindness, aphagia due to esophageal stenosis, respiratory failure due to tracheal or laryngeal stenosis, and urinary and sexual dysfunctions due to genital involvement. These patients are usually treated using immunosuppressive drugs. Indeed, corticosteroids (CS) are not recommended in MMP. Cyclophosphamide was considered as the most effective immunosuppressant in severe forms of MMP, before the use of rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (MAb). Two series from our group have assessed the advantages and disadvantages of IV pulse and oral administration of cyclophosphamide in MMP. Oral administration seems more rapidly effective with 54% of complete remission (CR) after a median time of 24 weeks (16-52 weeks). The results of 41 patients with severe types of MMP (including a French series of 20 patients) treated with rituximab have been published. Rate of CR after one and two cycles were 66% and 90%, respectively. Clinical improvement was rapid, since a decrease in disease activity was observed after 4 weeks of treatment in 64% of patients. Our results and those of the literature suggest that rituximab might be more effective than cyclophosphamide, which has been considered as the gold standard of treatment in severe forms of disease, up to now.
• Male or female patients aged ≥18 years old and ≤ 80 years old with a newly diagnosed or previously diagnosed severe MMP diagnosed according to the International MMP Consensus (Chan 2002) on the following criteria:
• Clinical features: Blisters or erosions predominantly affecting any or all mucous membranes (oral, nasal, pharyngeal, laryngeal, anal, genital, or esophageal,) with or without clinically observable scarring. Ocular involvement includes conjunctival inflammation, shortening of fornices, symblepharon, ankyloblepharon, entropion, trichiasis and corneal neovascularisation.
• Patients with skin involvement must not have more than 2 out of the 4 clinical criteria for bullous pemphigoid (BP) proposed by the French group (Vaillant L et al,1998; Joly P et al. 2004) Direct Immunofluorescence (DIF): Linear deposits of IgG, IgA and/or C3 on the BMZ by DIF of patient's skin or mucous membrane Histology: Sub epithelial blister with or without significant leukocyte infiltrate by standard histology of skin or mucosal lesions, when the skin or mucosal biopsy is possible and appropriate.
• MMP is defined as severe in patients with:
• Sight-threatening ocular disease, and/or Potentially life-threatening laryngeal, tracheal or oesophageal stenosis, and/or Involvement of a mucosal site where there is a risk of scarring stenosis (larynx, trachea, esophagus, anus, foreskin, vagina…) and/or More than one mucosal site involved and/or Mucosal involvement (including exclusive but severe oral involvement defined as an oral MMP DAI score \> 10), and/or Skin involvement, which have not achieved control of disease activity despite a one month treatment with dapsone at the maximum dose tolerated or for patients with sight-threatening ocular disease, and/or potentially life-threatening laryngeal, tracheal or oesophageal stenosis, without previous treatment by dapsone
• Patient having read and understood the information letter and signed the Informed Consent Form
• Patient with updated vaccinations. It is recommended that a patient's vaccination record and the need for immunization prior to study entry be carefully investigated.
• For women who are not postmenopausal (≥12 months of non-therapy-induced amenorrhoea) or surgically sterile (absence of ovaries and/or uterus) and who do not plan on having children anymore: agreement to remain abstinent or use two adequate methods of contraception, including at least one method with a failure rate of \<1% per year, during the treatment period and for at least 12 months after the last dose of study treatment.
• Abstinence is acceptable only if it is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient.
• Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, or postovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.
• Barrier methods must always be supplemented with the use of a spermicide.
• For men: Surgical sterility or agreement to remain abstinent or use a condom during the treatment period and for at least 12 months after the last dose of study treatment and agreement to refrain from donating sperm during this same period.
• Abstinence is only acceptable if it is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient.
• Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, or postovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.
• Patient agreement to avoid excessive exposure to sunlight during study participation
• Patient able to comply with the study protocol, in the investigator's judgment
• Patient affiliated with, or beneficiary of a social security category