Evaluation of Acute Endovascular Treatment in Symptomatic Isolated Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion
Our main hypothesis is that acute EVT associated with best medical treatment is superior to best medical treatment alone, for improving clinical outcomes at 90 days, in patients with mild or severe acute ischemique stroke and diffusion-perfusion or clinical-imaging mismatch, secondary to CICAO.
• ≥18-year-old patients (no upper age limit)
• Clinical signs consistent with AIS (Acute ischemic stroke)
• NIHSS score \>5 at randomization time with time from last seen well to randomization ≤23h, or fluctuating neurological symptoms, defined as recurrent transient attacks and/or progression of neurological deficit within the last 7 days.
• Ischemic stroke confirmed by cerebral imaging (CT: Computed Tomography or MRI:Magnetic Resonance Imaging) or normal imaging with suspected ischemic stroke
• Existence of a mismatch: If perfusion data are available (PWI/CTP), existence of a core-perfusion mismatch, suggestive of carotid hemodynamic mechanism, according to the DEFUSE-3 criteria: mismatch volume ≥15 mL, core volume ≤70 mL, and mismatch ratio ≥1.8 ; if perfusion data are not available, or non interpretable, existence of a clinical-imaging mismatch, defined by an ASPECTS \>5 (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score)
• CICAO (Cervical isolated Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion) all causes (for example dissection, atheroma or undetermined cause) on CTA (Computed Tomography Angiography) or MRA with gadolinium, without associated visible ipsilateral large intracranial occlusion (T or L, M1, M2, A1, A2, P1, P2), \<1 h before randomization
• Anticipated possibility to start the EVT procedure (arterial access) within 60 minutes after randomization
• Pre-stroke mRS score ≤2
• Patient or patient's representative has received information about the study and has signed and dated the appropriate Informed Consent or met the criteria for emergency consent, signed by the investigator