Learn About Esophageal Perforation

Introduction to Esophageal Perforation

Esophageal perforation is a rare but life-threatening medical emergency that occurs when a hole or tear develops in the esophagus, the muscular tube that connects the throat to the stomach. Because the esophagus lacks a protective outer layer like other digestive organs, a rupture allows food, stomach acid, and bacteria to leak into surrounding tissues of the chest or abdomen, leading to severe infection and inflammation. Without timely treatment, this condition can quickly progress to life-threatening complications such as mediastinitis, sepsis, or respiratory failure.

Although uncommon, esophageal perforation is critical for both patients and clinicians to understand because early recognition and intervention can significantly improve survival. Causes range from medical procedures and traumatic injuries to forceful vomiting, foreign body ingestion, or underlying esophageal disease. This article will explore what esophageal perforation is, its causes and risk factors, how it develops, the signs and symptoms to watch for, diagnostic methods, treatment options, and what patients can expect for recovery and long-term outcomes.

What is Esophageal Perforation?

Esophageal perforation is defined as a hole or tear in the structure of the esophagus—the muscular tube that connects the throat to the stomach. Esophageal perforation is rare, but it is a medical emergency, as the contents of the esophagus (food, saliva, stomach acid, and bacteria) are capable of leaking into adjacent chest tissues. This can lead to serious conditions like mediastinitis, sepsis, or pleural effusion.

The esophagus has no protective serosal covering as the intestines do, allowing infection to spread relatively quickly if the tissue is damaged. The severity of the esophageal perforation is determined by the size and location of the perforation, as well as the time it took to diagnose and treat. An esophageal perforation, unless treated quickly, can be life-threatening. An esophageal rupture should ideally be diagnosed and treated within a 24-h window to get the best outcome usually repair, either endoscopically or through wide-open surgical repair.

Causes and risk factors for Esophageal Perforation

Esophageal perforations can arise due to several reasons that fall under the general categories of iatrogenic (medically induced), spontaneous, traumatic, foreign body, and esophageal pathology. It is important to establish the mechanism of injury so as to ensure management and prevention strategies are adequate.

Iatrogenic: Iatrogenic injury is the most common type of esophageal perforation accounting for nearly 70% of cases. Iatrogenic injuries arise primarily from medical or diagnostic procedures, such as:

  • Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD): This is one of the most frequently used diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, during which injury to the esophageal wall arise estrogenically.
  • Esophageal dilatation: Dilatation is performed to treat stricture. There is always a risk of tears in the esophagus.
  • Nasogastric tube insertion: Rarely, improper placement or excessive force can lead to perforation with nasogastric tube insertion.
  • Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE): Placing an ultrasound probe through the esophagus can result in trauma to the esophagus before identifying it being “unable” to be placed due to underlying issues with the esophageal tissue.
  • Surgical procedures: Operations to the neck, chest, and spine inadvertently damaging the esophagus may occur to the esophagus with more frequency in complex or emergent

Spontaneous (Boerhaave Syndrome): Spontaneous esophageal perforation (Boerhaave syndrome) occurs when no external trauma is present and results from a sudden, forceful increase in intraesophageal pressure. Examples include:

  • Violent vomiting or retching or hemorrhagic ascitic events
  • Seizures
  • The 3rd stage of childbirth (whatever that means- very rare)
  • Weightlifting or other high level of muscular strain
  • This form of perforation is especially dangerous because it typically causes a full-thickness rupture and may go unrecognized initially, leading to delayed treatment.

Traumatic Causes: Trauma to the neck or chest can cause direct damage to the esophagus. Some common traumatic causes include:

  • Penetrating injury, like a gunshot or stab wound
  • Blunt trauma, like from a motor vehicle accident or fall
  • Barotrauma where air pressure sudden changes from something like an explosion
  • Caustic ingestion or a strong acid or alkali burns through the lining of the esophagus

Foreign Body Ingestion: Swallowing sharp or large foreign objects can tear, injury, or puncture the esophagus. This is particularly common in children, elderly, or individuals with psychiatric or developmental disorders. Things that are regularly implicated include:

  • Fish bones
  • Dentures
  • Coins
  • Batteries
  • Needles or pins
  • The risk of perforation is heightened when the foreign object is sharp, it is stuck for a long time, or it exerts pressure necrosis.

Sustained Pressure from a Tumor or Obstruction: A tumor, whether benign or malignant, can exert constant pressure on the esophageal wall which overtime may reduce blood flow to the tissue leading to ischemia and eventually tissue death (necrosis) causing perforation. Prolonged impaction of a foreign object can also cause the same effects.

6. Esophageal Ulcers from GERD: Gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD) can cause chronic inflammation and ulceration of the esophagus’ lining.

  • Over time, esophageal ulcers may erode deeply enough to cause perforation, particularly if left untreated or in patients with severe reflux disease.

By identifying the underlying cause of esophageal perforation, clinicians can better tailor treatment approaches and reduce the risk of complications. Early recognition and timely management are essential regardless of the cause.

Risk Factors That Increase the Chances of Esophageal Perforation

Some people are at higher risk of esophageal perforation because of underlying conditions or previous treatments. Risk factors which are important for esophageal perforation are:

  • Esophageal strictures or narrowing: A narrowed esophagus is inherently more likely to perforate when swallowing or due to endoscopy-related manipulations; long-term acid reflux or scarring results in esophageal strictures.
  • Prior surgery/radiation: Previous surgeries or radiation therapy can weaken esophageal tissue, making it fragile and more susceptible to injury.
  • Esophageal cancer: Tumors can erode the esophageal wall or obstruct it altogether which raises the risk of perforation.
  • Chronic vomiting/alcoholism: Chronic episodes of vomiting, particularly among alcoholic patients, creates a periodic and repeated tensile load to the esophagus which raises the chances of perforation.
  • Connective tissue disorder: Patients with connective tissue disorders such as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome tend to have weaker esophageal walls which may be less elastic and more prone to perforation.

In summary, esophageal perforation typically does not occur spontaneously, it tends to be caused by simultaneous pressure applied to weakened tissue, plus an additional external force or pressure. Understanding these risk factors and causes early is an important part of potentially preventing this serious condition.

How Esophageal Perforation develops

Esophageal perforation occurs when the esophageal wall is compromised or torn, allowing food, stomach acid, and bacteria to enter adjacent structures. The conditions and mechanisms that can cause an esophageal rupture vary widely.

  • Medical Procedures: Medical procedures represent the most common means of esophageal rupture. When undertaking a procedure such as esophageal dilation or endoscopy, the esophagus has the potential to be torn or otherwise perforated by the progress of the procedure. Often, a clinician could utilize excessive force with their surgical instruments. In addition, other medical conditions, medications, and comorbidities, would increase the likelihood of an esophageal rupture as well.
  • Forceful vomiting: A major cause of esophageal perforation is due to excessive vomiting. Excessive vomiting elevates the pressure in the abdomen which can exceed threshold pressures, resulting in a rupture of the esophagus. In my experience, this is most commonly seen in the distal esophagus, termed Boerhaave syndrome.
  • Trauma: Trauma to the chest and neck that produces a direct sequence of interventions can contribute to injury to the esophagus. In this case, the mechanism of injury can be related to a blunt force trauma such as in a car accident, fall, stabbing, or other means. Also, objects such as needles or bone that are ingested inappropriately can lead to perforation and tearing from the inside of the esophagus.
  • Chemical burns: Certain caustic substances such as strong acids or alkalis can burn through the esophagus. This is particularly true among people who ingest caustic substances, especially household cleaners or industrial chemicals that go untreated.
Signs and symptoms of Esophageal Perforation

The signs and symptoms of esophageal perforation depend on the location of the perforation, the cause of the injury, and the amount of time that has elapsed since the injury. Symptoms usually come on suddenly and progress aggressively—thus, it is crucial that esophageal perforation is diagnosed and recognized in a timely manner, and expedited treatment is achieved to maximize survival.

Symptoms commonly include:

  • Severe chest pain: Typically sudden, sharp, and severe chest discomfort. The chest pain may radiate to the back, shoulders, or upper abdomen like in the presentation of a heart attack.
  • Odynophagia: Pain while swallowing; characterized as sharp or stabbing while swallowing.
  • Dysphagia: Difficulty swallowing. May present as trouble pushing food or liquids down, or the sensation of something “stuck” in the throat.
  • Shortness of breath (dyspnea): Poor breathing or choking sensation due to inflammation of the pleura or fluid accumulation in the chest cavity.
  • Fever and chills: Indicate an infection of an inflammatory process has developed; may escalate to sepsis.
  • Vomiting: Vomiting may occur in the case of perforation, may include blood depending on the severity of perforation or other causes.
  • Neck pain or discomfort or swelling: Especially with an upper esophagus tear.
  • Hoarseness: Varying degrees of hoarseness or change in voice may be due to irritation or pressure nearby where the vocal cords are located; particularly with an upper tear.
  • Tachycardia: Increased heart rate may indicate pain, infection, and/or blood loss.
  • Low blood pressure (hypotension): Indicates a late sign that the patient may be in shock; particularly with advanced infection.

Physical Examination Findings

  • Subcutaneous emphysema: A crunching or popping sensation under the skin, most notably in the neck or chest, results from air escaping into the soft tissues.
  • Hamman’s sign: A crunching or crackling sound heard with each heartbeat, noted when listening to the chest, results from air trapped in the mediastinum (the space between the lungs).
  • Signs of sepsis: In more advanced cases, patients may be confused, have low oxygen levels, or show signs of shock (markers of systemic infection).
Why timing matters for Esophageal Perforation

Time is essential in cases of esophageal perforation. The earlier it is diagnosed and treated, the better the outcome. If not treated within 24 hours, serious complications (such as wide-spread infection, respiratory failure, or even death) may occur. Timely recognition and appropriate medical attention are key to survival.

Diagnosis of Esophageal Perforation

Prompt diagnosis of esophageal perforation is important to prevent cascading complications and a greater chance of death. Symptoms may be indistinguishable from other clinical scenarios, such as heart attack or pneumonia. This makes a high degree of clinical suspicion necessary. All the more so for patients with recent substance vomiting, trauma, or procedures on the esophagus. Diagnosis usually involves modalities that may include endoscopy and X-ray and/or CT scans.

Imaging Studies

Usually, the first approach on presentation for suspected perforation is an imaging study. Again, its value is not only for diagnosis, but also to gather information about the injury’s location and the extent of injury.

  • Chest X-ray: Chest X-rays are often the first and most accessible imaging study for suspected esophageal perforation. They provide a quick overview of abnormalities that tend to correlate with a patient’s presenting symptoms. Early findings on a chest X-ray may include mediastinal widening, which suggests inflammation or fluid accumulation in the chest. Another common sign is subcutaneous emphysema, where air escapes into the soft tissues under the skin, typically in the neck or upper chest. A pleural effusion may also be visible, representing fluid buildup in the lungs—most often on the left side. Finally, pneumomediastinum, or the presence of air trapped within the mediastinum between the lungs and central structures, can also be detected on X-ray and is highly suggestive of perforation.
  • Contrast Esophagography (Barium or Gastrografin Swallow): You can complete an esophagography by having the patient swallow a contrast dye that will highlight the esophagus on an X-ray or fluoroscopy. This procedure can designate the exact site of leakage. A gastrografin swallow preferred first, because it will be the water-soluble compound in case of leakage as the tissue will suffer less irritation than Barium.Barium can be used if gastrografin fails to detect the perforation, but it should be avoided in patients at risk of aspiration, as it can cause severe inflammation if it enters the lungs or mediastinum.
  • CT Scan of the Chest: A CT scan provides detailed cross-sectional images of the esophagus and nearby structures, offering more precise information than a standard X-ray. This imaging can reveal the presence of air in the mediastinum, fluid collections, or abscesses that may develop as complications of a perforation. It is also valuable in determining the size and exact location of the tear, as well as identifying thickening or inflammation of the esophageal wall. CT scans are particularly useful when the diagnosis remains uncertain after other studies, or when additional complications such as infection or abscess formation are suspected.

Endoscopy

Flexible esophagoscopy allows direct visualization of the esophageal lining, allowing the physician to identify the tear and size as well as evaluate the adjacent tissue. Again, endoscopy must be utilized with caution because insufflation of air and manipulation may worsen the perforation.

Endoscopy is typically reserved for cases in which imaging fails to clarify the diagnosis or in cases requiring therapeutic (e.g., stent) interventions.

Location of the Perforation

Understanding where the perforation occurs can assist in directing treatment. Statistically:

  • The most common location is the chest (thoracic esophagus) (55%);
  • The second most common location is the neck (cervical esophagus) (25%);
  • The least common location is the abdominal portion (20%) for esophageal perforation.
  • An accurate and timely diagnosis, particularly within 24 hours, is critical for improving patient outcomes and avoiding severe consequences such as sepsis, respiratory failure, or even death.
Treatment of Esophageal Perforation

The management of esophageal perforation is a medical emergency that requires a tailored approach based on several key factors, including:

  • The size and location of the tear
  • The reason for the perforation (spontaneous vs. iatrogenic)
  • The time elapsed since perforation
  • The presence or absence of infection/sepsis
  • The overall clinical condition/stability of the patient

Immediate treatment (ideally within 24-hours) is key to improving outcome and minimizing risk of life-threatening complications.

Initial Stabilization: Regardless of etiology, the initial management is aimed at stabilizing the patient and minimizing further contamination.

  • NPO (Nothing by Mouth): Food and drink should be stopped to prevent further leakage of esophageal content into the chest or abdominal cavity.
  • Intravenous (IV) fluids: Hydration and blood pressure support.
  • Broad-spectrum IV antibiotics: Prevent or treat infection. Cover aerobic and anaerobic organisms.
  • Proton pump inhibitors (PPI): Reduce acid production to minimize further irritation of the esophageal lining.
  • Pain control: Adequate pain relief is important for comfort in addition to patient stabilization.
  • Oxygen support/ventilatory support (if there is respiratory distress).
  • Nutritional support: May include parenteral nutrition (IV nutrition) or nutrition via a feeding tube beyond the perforation (e.g., jejunostomy).

Definitive Treatment

The choice will either be conservative, endoscopic or surgical management depending on the extent of perforation or complexity of the case.

1. Conservative (Non-Surgical) Management: This method is reserved for select, stable patients with:

  • Small, contained perforations
  • Minimal signs of symptoms
  • No signs of systemic infection or sepsis
  • Early diagnosis (typically within 24 hours)
  • Conservative treatment for perforations includes:
  • Extended monitoring in an intensive care unit (ICU)
  • Continued NPO and intravenous antibiotics
  • Serial imaging to assess for healing
  • Nutritional support accommodating enteral or parenteral support
  • If there is failure of conservative care, or if there is no clinical improvement, or the patient’s status declines, more aggressive therapy will be required.

2. Endoscopic Approaches: Endoscopic techniques are an option for minimally invasive approaches to closing perforations. These techniques are very effective in:

  • Small iatrogenic tears
  • Small contained perforations with a relatively early diagnosis
  • Patients who are poor candidates for surgical intervention
  • Endoscopy techniques include:
  • Endoscopic clips to close small defects
  • Covered self-expandables seals larger defects and allow healing
  • Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT), but this is limited to specialized centers for selected patients
  • Stents may stay in position for several weeks, and they are typically removed once evidence of esophageal healing is present.

3. Surgical Intervention: The next treatment option would surgery, typically requiring more complex (especially in the case of delaying an intervention) or in more severe cases, these include:

  • Large or uncontained perforations
  • Delayed diagnosis (24 hours)
  • Failure of conservative and/or endoscopic management
  • Failure of a condom and/or abscess
  • Evidence of clear systemic sepsis and/or shock

When surgery is necessary, subsequent options may include:

  • Primary repair: Direct suturing of the esophageal tear, often combined with reinforcement using tissue flaps or muscle grafts.
  • Drainage: To remove infected fluid or abscesses from the chest or abdominal cavity.
  • Esophagectomy: Partial or complete removal of the esophagus in cases of severe tissue necrosis or malignancy.
  • Feeding jejunostomy: Placement of a feeding tube into the small intestine to ensure nutrition during recovery.

Postoperative care involves continued antibiotics, nutritional support, and close monitoring for signs of leak or infection.

Prognosis for Esophageal Perforation

With prompt detection and adequate management, many patients will recover satisfactorily. However, delay of definitive care significantly increases risks of complications such as:

  • Mediastinitis
  • Sepsis
  • Multi-organ failure
  • Unnecessary length of hospital stay
  • Death

Follow up typically includes repeat imaging to confirm healing, nutritional rehabilitation and assessment for any underlying esophageal disorder that may have contributed to the perforation.

Conclusion

Esophageal perforation is a rare but extremely serious condition that requires prompt recognition and urgent medical care. The perforation can occur as the result of medical interventions, trauma, spontaneous rupture (particularly during forceful vomiting), or as a result of swallowing a foreign object. Symptoms including sudden onset of chest pain, difficulty swallowing, and subcutaneous emphysema should raise concern.

Early diagnosis via imaging and in some cases endoscopy, combined with timely treatment, is critical. Treatment options vary depending on the case, and can include careful observation and medical management, endoscopic repair, or a major surgical intervention. The most important consideration is to act quickly; delays greater than 24 hours crucially increase the risk for severe infection, organ failure, and death.

Advancements in endoscopic techniques and supportive care have improved outcome measures. However, early intervention is still key to survival. With greater recognition by health care providers, as well as rapid referral to a specialized care team, the difference between life and death becomes even greater.

References
  1. Brinster, C. J., Sinha, S., Lee, L., Marshall, M. B., Kaiser, L. R., & Kucharczuk, J. C. (2004). Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 77(4), 1475–1483
  2. Kuppusamy, M. K., Hubka, M. J., Felisky, C. D., O’Donovan, M., & Paulson, E. C. (2011). Esophageal perforation: Diagnostic patterns and outcomes. The American Surgeon, 77(9), 1151–1156
  3. Schweigert, M., Dubecz, A., & Stein, H. J. (2013). Surgical management of esophageal perforation: Nationwide analysis of 2,564 patients. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 96(4), 1248–1253
  4. Eroglu, A., Can Kurkcuoglu, I., Karaoganogu, N., Tekinbas, C., Yimaz, O., & Basog, M. (2004). Esophageal perforation: The importance of early diagnosis and primary repair. Diseases of the Esophagus, 17(1), 91–94
  5. Søreide, J. A., Viste, A., & Hauge, E. R. (2010). Esophageal perforation: Diagnostic work-up and clinical decision-making in a new era of treatment. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 16(30), 3786–3793
  6. Markar, S. R., Mackenzie, H., Wiggins, T., Faiz, O., & Hanna, G. B. (2015). Management and outcomes of esophageal perforation: A national study of 2,564 patients in England. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 110(10), 1559–1566

Who are the top Esophageal Perforation Local Doctors?
Siva Raja
Elite in Esophageal Perforation
Thoracic Surgery
Elite in Esophageal Perforation
Thoracic Surgery

Cleveland Clinic Main Campus

9500 Euclid Avenue, 
Cleveland, OH 
Experience:
29+ years
Languages Spoken:
English, Tamil
Offers Telehealth

Siva Raja is a Thoracic Surgeon in Cleveland, Ohio. Dr. Raja has been practicing medicine for over 29 years and is rated as an Elite provider by MediFind in the treatment of Esophageal Perforation. His top areas of expertise are Achalasia, Hiatal Hernia, Esophageal Perforation, Endoscopy, and Lymphadenectomy.

Elite in Esophageal Perforation
Thoracic Surgery | General Surgery
Elite in Esophageal Perforation
Thoracic Surgery | General Surgery

Fairview Express Care

909 Fulton St Se, 
Minneapolis, MN 
Languages Spoken:
English, French, German, Spanish
Accepting New Patients
Offers Telehealth

Rafael Andrade is a Thoracic Surgeon and a General Surgeon in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Dr. Andrade is rated as an Elite provider by MediFind in the treatment of Esophageal Perforation. His top areas of expertise are Esophageal Perforation, Pleuropulmonary Blastoma, Lung Cancer, Thymectomy, and Endoscopy. Dr. Andrade is currently accepting new patients.

 
 
 
 
Learn about our expert tiers
Learn More
Elite in Esophageal Perforation
Thoracic Surgery
Elite in Esophageal Perforation
Thoracic Surgery
2160 S 1st Ave, 
Maywood, IL 
Languages Spoken:
English
Accepting New Patients

Richard Freeman is a Thoracic Surgeon in Maywood, Illinois. Dr. Freeman is rated as an Elite provider by MediFind in the treatment of Esophageal Perforation. His top areas of expertise are Esophageal Perforation, Pleural Effusion, Lung Cancer, Stent Placement, and Thymectomy. Dr. Freeman is currently accepting new patients.

What are the latest Esophageal Perforation Clinical Trials?
A Pilot Study to Establish Best Treatment Strategy for T4 Esophageal Cancer

Summary: The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the safety and efficacy of a new treatment approach for T4-stage esophageal cancer, which involves chemoradiotherapy after induction chemotherapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the new induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation reduce esophageal perforation rate? * Does the new induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradia...

Match to trials
Find the right clinical trials for you in under a minute
Get started
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Underwater Versus Carbon Dioxide Insufflation During Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (U-POEM Trial)

Summary: Multicenter randomized trial comparing post-procedural pain intensity after Per-Oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) between two types of standard of care insufflation methods (CO2 vs Underwater). POEM is routinely performed under carbon dioxide insufflation (CO2-POEM) as this gas is more rapidly absorbed than air, which has been shown to reduce gas-related complications. Water immersion for luminal dis...