Hearing Loss Clinical Trials

Find Hearing Loss Clinical Trials Near You

PLUS-Optimal for Adults With Listening Difficulties: Investigating the Roles of Listening and Thinking Skills in Online Training Across Different Groups

Status: Recruiting
Location: See location...
Intervention Type: Behavioral
Study Type: Interventional
Study Phase: Not Applicable
SUMMARY

WP1: PLUS-Auditory Training The goal of this experimental study is to better understand how task difficulty affects on-task learning thresholds and generalised benefits in two PLUS auditory training tasks involving perceptual and cognitive learning in adults aged 18+ (no upper age limit) with listening difficulties. The main question it aims to answer is: * Does adjusting task difficulty in PLUS, by manipulating the perceptual and cognitive demands of the phonemic discrimination and competing speech tasks, affect on-task learning thresholds and off-task performance in adults with listening difficulties? Researchers will compare the two experimental arms (easy/hard) to see whether adjusting task difficulty influences on-task learning thresholds and off-task performance. Participants will: * Be randomly assigned to one of two training programs (phonemic discrimination or competing speech) within the two experimental arms (easy/hard); * Perform training for a minimum of 30 minutes per day, 5 days per week, for two weeks (total 10 training sessions, 5 hours of training); * Complete pre- and post- training assessments to measure on-task learning performance and change in performance for untrained measures of speech perception, cognition and self-reported outcomes. WP2: Post-Training Focus Groups The goal of this observational study is to gain in-depth qualitative insights into participants' motivations, experiences of task difficulty, and perceived benefits across the PLUS-AT training groups in adults aged 18+ (no upper age limit) with listening difficulties. The main question it aims to answer is: * How do participants describe their experiences and perceptions of PLUS-AT, particularly regarding task difficulty and self-perceived changes in listening, hearing, thinking, and quality of life? Researchers will explore participant experiences across the two experimental arms (easy/hard) to determine whether motivations for seeking auditory training, knowledge and beliefs about auditory training, attitudes toward PLUS-AT difficulty, and self-perceived changes in listening, hearing, thinking, and quality of life differ. A subset of participants (n = 20) will: * Be invited from WP1 to join one of four online focus groups (60-90 minutes via Microsoft Teams); * Attend the focus group corresponding to their assigned training program (phonemic discrimination or competing-speech) within the two experimental arms (easy/hard); * Share their experiences of completing PLUS-AT.

Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Minimum Age: 18
Healthy Volunteers: t
View:

• Adults (aged 18+ years, no upper age limit);

• Poorer performance on the DTT (SRT of -5.5 dB SNR or higher, as defined by Dawes, 2013) completed without hearing aid(s) for those who typically use them;

• Non-hearing device users or hearing aid(s) owner;

• Ability to read and understand English;

• Ability to provide informed consent;

• Access to the internet;

• Access to functional built-in speakers, external speakers, or headphones.

Locations
Other Locations
United Kingdom
NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre
RECRUITING
Nottingham
Contact Information
Primary
Natalie Lerigo-Smith, MSc
natalie.lerigo-smith1@nottingham.ac.uk
+44 (0)115 8232600
Backup
Helen Henshaw, PhD
helen.henshaw@nottingham.ac.uk
+44 (0) 115 8232606
Time Frame
Start Date: 2026-03-13
Estimated Completion Date: 2027-02-01
Participants
Target number of participants: 120
Treatments
Experimental: Lower perceptual and cognitive demands (Easier)
Trainees are asked to train for a minimum of 30 min/day, 5 days/week over a 2-week period (300 minutes in total) and randomly assigned to one of two adaptive tasks, either:~PLUS Phonemic Discrimination (0-back) A 3-interval, 3-alternate forced choice (oddball paradigm) task using eleven phoneme continua (/a/-/uh/, /b/-/d/, /d/-/g/, /e/-/a/, /er/-/or/, /i/-/e/, /l/-/r/, /m/-/n/, /s/-/sh/, /s/-/th/, and /v/-/w/), embedded within syllables, and synthesised from endpoints of real voice recordings. Trainees are asked to respond with the 'odd' sound immediately after presentation of the three stimuli.~Or:~PLUS Competing Speech: (male, female) Based on the Coordinate Response Measure (CRM), based on the Coordinate Response Measure (CRM), real world sentences are spoken by a target and masker that differ in gender. Trainees are asked to report two keywords spoken by the target talker from a list of all options, whilst ignoring the masker talker.
Experimental: Higher perceptual and cognitive demands (Harder)
Trainees are asked to train for a minimum of 30 min/day, 5 days/week over a 2-week period (300 minutes in total) and randomly assigned to one of two adaptive tasks, either:~PLUS Phonemic Discrimination (1-back) A 3-interval, 3-alternate forced choice (oddball paradigm) task using eleven phoneme continua (/a/-/uh/, /b/-/d/, /d/-/g/, /e/-/a/, /er/-/or/, /i/-/e/, /l/-/r/, /m/-/n/, /s/-/sh/, /s/-/th/, and /v/-/w/), embedded within syllables, and synthesised from endpoints of real voice recordings. Trainees are asked to respond with the 'odd' sound for the three stimuli presented in the prior trial, while holding the 'odd' sound for the current trial in memory.~Or:~PLUS Competing Speech: (female, female) Based on the Coordinate Response Measure (CRM), real world sentences are spoken by a target and masker of the same gender. Trainees are asked to report two keywords spoken by the target talker from a list of all options, whilst ignoring the masker talker.
Related Therapeutic Areas
Sponsors
Leads: University of Nottingham
Collaborators: National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

This content was sourced from clinicaltrials.gov