The Efficacy and Safety of Fluoroscopic-Guided Bipolar Versus Monopolar Pulsed Radiofrequency for Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: An Exploratory Study

Status: Recruiting
Location: See all (2) locations...
Intervention Type: Procedure
Study Type: Interventional
Study Phase: Not Applicable
SUMMARY

A prospective exploratory study aiming at comparing pulsed bipolar versus pulsed unipolar radiofrequency ablation in patients with medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia.

Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Healthy Volunteers: f
View:

• Patients with a definitive diagnosis of classical TN based on the third version of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3).

• Either purely paroxysmal classical TN or classical TN with concomitant chronic pain.

• Patients with idiopathic TN, with symptomatic clinical topography of V2 and/or V3.

• Patients with brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) unremarkable for structural etiology for the trigeminal pain.

• Patients with medically refractory TN defined as pain persisting beyond three months at a level of ≥5/10 after monotherapy or polytherapy in appropriate medical doses.

Locations
Other Locations
Egypt
Alexandria University Faculty of Medicine
RECRUITING
Alexandria
Cairo University Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine
RECRUITING
Cairo
Contact Information
Primary
Eman Hamdy, PhD
eman.ameen@alexmed.edu.eg
+201061402092
Backup
Ahmed Elshal, PhD
dr.ahmedelshal@gmail.com
+201002998841
Time Frame
Start Date: 2024-01-01
Estimated Completion Date: 2025-09-01
Participants
Target number of participants: 20
Treatments
Placebo_comparator: Monopolar pulsed radiofrequncy
Patients with refractory TN undergoing monopolar pulsed radiofrequency
Active_comparator: Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency
Patients with refractory TN undergoing bipolar pulsed radiofrequency
Related Therapeutic Areas
Sponsors
Leads: Alexandria University

This content was sourced from clinicaltrials.gov