Conventional Vs. Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy Immediate and Short-Term Outcomes

Status: Recruiting
Location: See location...
Intervention Type: Procedure
Study Type: Interventional
Study Phase: Not Applicable
SUMMARY

the goal of this interventional study is to compare between the conventional and the Eversion techniques in performing carotid endarterectomy in patients with carotid artery stenosis the main question it aim to answer is which technique is much more safe and effective the participants will have carotid endarterectomy by one of the two techniques the researcher will compare the group subjected to conventional carotid endarterectomy and the group subjected to Eversion carotid endarterectomy to see which technique is more effective and safe

Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Minimum Age: 18
Maximum Age: 80
Healthy Volunteers: f
View:

• Patients having carotid artery stenosis with cerebral events (recent stroke).

• Patients having high grade carotid artery stenosis with increasing symptoms.

• Patients underwent previously CEA presented with carotid restenosis.

Locations
Other Locations
Egypt
Sohag University
RECRUITING
Sohag
Contact Information
Primary
kariem Ay Mohamed
kareem.mahmoud@med.sohag.edu.eg
+201010455201
Time Frame
Start Date: 2024-02
Estimated Completion Date: 2025-02
Participants
Target number of participants: 40
Treatments
Active_comparator: group (A) conventional CEA
this group of patients will be subjected to carotid endarterectomy using the conventional technique of this procedure
Active_comparator: group (B) Eversion CEA
this group of patients will be subjected to carotid endarterectomy using the Eversion technique of this procedure
Sponsors
Leads: Sohag University

This content was sourced from clinicaltrials.gov