A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Partial Stomach-Partitioning Gastrojejunostomy (SPGJ) Versus Conventional Gastrojejunostomy (CGJ) for the Treatment of Gastric Outlet Obstruction in Advanced Gastric Cancer
The primary goal of clinical treatment is to relieve obstruction, restore oral feeding, improve nutritional status and improve quality of life in patients with advanced gastric cancer outflow tract obstruction. At present, the common surgical treatment for relieving obstruction is traditional gastrojejunostomy. Although the operation can relieve the obstruction, there are problems such as tumor-induced bleeding, anastomotic invasion, and high incidence of delayed gastric emptying after operation. Partitioned gastrojejunostomy effectively relieves obstruction by anastomosis of a part of the stomach to the jejunum, and isolates the tumor from the anastomosis, which is beneficial to food emptying and can reduce the risk of bleeding and anastomotic invasion. The safety and efficacy of these two procedures are still controversial, mainly because previous studies were retrospective studies or included a small sample size or enrolled patients with different pathological characteristics. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of separated and traditional gastrojejunostomy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer outflow tract obstruction, and to provide the best choice for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer outflow tract obstruction.
• Patients and their families were fully aware of this study and voluntarily signed informed consent ; 2.Age 18-75 years old ( including 18 and 75 years old ) ; 3.Distal gastric cancer ( cT4bN + M0 / T3-4N + M1, stage IV ) with locally unresectable, distant metastasis or peritoneal metastasis confirmed by pathology and unable to undergo radical surgery ; 4.Complicated with digestive tract obstruction ( gastric retention confirmed by upper gastrointestinal radiography or gastroscopy, and GOOSS score ≤ 1 ) ; the ECOG score was 0-2 points, and there was no deterioration within 7 days ; 6.ASA score I-III ; 7.No previous anti-tumor therapy ( such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, etc. ) :
⁃ The functions of important organs meet the following requirements :
⁃ (a) absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 × 109 / L, white blood cell count ≥ 4.0 × 109/L; （b) Platelet ≥ 100 × 109 / L ; （c) Hemoglobin ≥ 60g / L ; （d) TBIL ≤ 1.5 times ULN ; （e) ALT and AST ≤ 2.5 times ULN ; （f) urea / urea nitrogen ( BUN ) and creatinine ( Cr ) ≤ 1.5 × ULN ( and creatinine clearance rate ( CCr ) ≥ 50mL / min ) ; （g) Left ventricular ejection fraction ( LVEF ) ≥ 50 % ; the corrected QT interval ( QTcF ) by Fridericia method was less than 470 ms. （i) INR ≤ 1.5 × ULN, APTT ≤ 1.5 × ULN. 9. women of childbearing age need to take effective contraceptive measures ; 10.No other surgical contraindications ; 11.good compliance, with follow-up.