Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Upfront Surgery for Clearly Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer and Periampullary Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status: Recruiting
Location: See location...
Intervention Type: Procedure, Drug
Study Type: Interventional
Study Phase: Phase 3
SUMMARY

Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery significantly improved the survival of pancreatic cancer (PC) patients, but there is a problem that only about 50% of patients start adjuvant chemotherapy after pancreatectomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy might control potential metastatic lesions which are not being detected in early disease status and improve the R0 resection rate. In addition, it prevents futile surgery by selecting patients with rapid progression of disease. Furthermore, compared to chemotherapy administered after surgery, more patients can complete the planned chemotherapy schedule in neoadjuvant setting. There are still few studies worldwide that prospectively explored the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable PC and periampullary cancer and the administration of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable PC depends on individual clinical judgment. Therefore, systematic and prospective clinical trials are essential to standardize treatment protocol in resectable PC and periampullary Cancer. This randomized controlled trial compares neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus upfront surgery for patients with clearly resectable pancreatic head cancer and periampullary cancer. The study aims to determine if neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival compared to immediate surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.

Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Minimum Age: 18
Maximum Age: 75
Healthy Volunteers: f
View:

• Histologically or cytologically confirmed pancreatic head cancer or periampullary carcinoma(endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsy).

• Clearly resectable disease as defined by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria on cross-sectional imaging:

⁃ No involvement or abutment of the celiac artery, common hepatic artery, superior mesenteric artery, or replaced right hepatic artery .

⁃ Less than 180 degree interface between tumor and vessel wall of the portal vein or superior mesenteric vein, and patent portal vein/splenic vein confluence No evidence of metastatic disease.

• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)=0-1 \& American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score \<4.

• Written informed consent.

• Medical history without previous pancreatic resection or pancreatic cancer.

• Adequate organ function (liver, kidney, bone marrow) (serum creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dL,reference range 0.5-1.20 mg/dL; serum albumin ≥2.5 g/dL, reference range 3.5-5.3; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤95 U/L, reference range 0-38; Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤102 U/L, reference range 0-41; prothrombin time ≤1.8, reference range 0-1.20; partial thromboplastin time ≤1.8, reference range 0.82-1.25; leukocyte count greater than 3.5×109/L, reference range 4.2-9.0; platelet count greater than 100×109/L, reference range 130-400; hemoglobin ≥9 g/dL, reference range 12-16).

Locations
Other Locations
Egypt
Liver and GIT hospital , Minia University
RECRUITING
Minya
Contact Information
Primary
Saleh K Saleh, MD
salehkhairy@mu.edu.eg
+201201765401
Backup
Rabeh K Saleh, MD
Rabeh.Saleh@mu.edu.eg
+201220065443
Time Frame
Start Date: 2025-07-20
Estimated Completion Date: 2028-08-20
Participants
Target number of participants: 262
Treatments
Experimental: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (mFOLFIRINOX)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy(mFOLFIRINOX) followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy
Active_comparator: Upfront Surgery Group
Pancreaticoduodenectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy
Sponsors
Leads: Minia University

This content was sourced from clinicaltrials.gov